Skip to content

References

Every published work cited anywhere in these docs, in one list. Each entry links to its DOI or a stable copy, and lists the pages that cite it, so a reviewer can check a source and see what it is used to support. Citations in the text link here.

Fields were checked against a primary or authoritative record (the publisher, a DOI registry, PubMed, a proceedings site or the author’s own copy) before publication. Where a field could not be confirmed, it is left out rather than guessed.

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TCited in Behavior before the act
  2. Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019). Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook’s ad delivery can lead to biased outcomes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), Article 199. doi.org/10.1145/3359301Cited in Splitting an audience, Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit, Privacy and permitted use
  3. Andreasen, A. R. (1984). Life status changes and changes in consumer preferences and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 784–794. doi.org/10.1086/209014Cited in The model catalog, Claims register, Habits and buying windows
  4. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939Cited in Behavior before the act, Claims register
  5. Ascarza, E. (2018). Retention futility: Targeting high-risk customers might be ineffective. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(1), 80–98. doi.org/10.1509/jmr.16.0163Cited in Claims register, Evaluating ranking models, Measuring what a campaign caused
  6. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671–732. doi.org/10.15779/Z38BG31Cited in Splitting an audience, Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit, Privacy and permitted use
  7. Beatty, S. E., & Smith, S. M. (1987). External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 83–95. doi.org/10.1086/209095Cited in Behavior before the act
  8. Berman, R. (2018). Beyond the last touch: Attribution in online advertising. Marketing Science, 37(5), 771–792. doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1104Cited in How a result is counted, Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  9. Blake, T., Nosko, C., & Tadelis, S. (2015). Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large-scale field experiment. Econometrica, 83(1), 155–174. doi.org/10.3982/ECTA12423Cited in Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  10. Bradley, A. P. (1997). The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30(7), 1145–1159. doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  11. Breiman, L. (2001). Statistical modeling: The two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author). Statistical Science, 16(3), 199–231. doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009213726Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  12. Brier, G. W. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78(1), 1–3. doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  13. Bucklin, R. E., & Sismeiro, C. (2009). Click here for Internet insight: Advances in clickstream data analysis in marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 35–48. doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.004Cited in Behavior before the act
  14. Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the present with Google Trends. Economic Record, 88(S1), 2–9. doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.00809.xCited in Behavior before the act
  15. Christen, P. (2012). Data matching: Concepts and techniques for record linkage, entity resolution, and duplicate detection. Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31164-2Cited in Identity resolution, Claims register, Identity and hashing
  16. Datta, A., Tschantz, M. C., & Datta, A. (2015). Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2015(1), 92–112. doi.org/10.1515/popets-2015-0007Cited in Traits, reasons and message fit
  17. DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44(3), 837–845. doi.org/10.2307/2531595Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  18. Demir, L., Kumar, A., Cunche, M., & Lauradoux, C. (2018). The pitfalls of hashing for privacy. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(1), 551–565. doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2747598Cited in Claims register, Identity and hashing, What leaves the platform
  19. Deng, A., Xu, Y., Kohavi, R., & Walker, T. (2013). Improving the sensitivity of online controlled experiments by utilizing pre-experiment data. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 123–132). ACM. doi.org/10.1145/2433396.2433413Cited in Measuring what a campaign caused
  20. Eckles, D., Gordon, B. R., & Johnson, G. A. (2018). Field studies of psychologically targeted ads face threats to internal validity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(23), E5254–E5255. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805363115Cited in Claims register, Research, Traits, reasons and message fit, Creative plan
  21. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  22. Fader, P. S., Hardie, B. G. S., & Lee, K. L. (2005). “Counting your customers” the easy way: An alternative to the Pareto/NBD model. Marketing Science, 24(2), 275–284. doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0098Cited in Habits and buying windows
  23. Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861–874. doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010Cited in Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  24. Fellegi, I. P., & Sunter, A. B. (1969). A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(328), 1183–1210. doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10501049Cited in Identity resolution, Claims register, Identity and hashing
  25. Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014). A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(4), Article 44. doi.org/10.1145/2523813Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  26. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92. doi.org/10.1145/3458723Cited in Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  27. Goel, S., Hofman, J. M., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Predicting consumer behavior with Web search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(41), 17486–17490. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005962107Cited in Signals and intent topics, Behavior before the act, Claims register
  28. Gordon, B. R., Zettelmeyer, F., Bhargava, N., & Chapsky, D. (2019). A comparison of approaches to advertising measurement: Evidence from big field experiments at Facebook. Marketing Science, 38(2), 193–225. doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1135Cited in Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  29. Gutierrez, P., & Gérardy, J.-Y. (2017). Causal inference and uplift modelling: A review of the literature. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Predictive Applications and APIs, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 67 (pp. 1–13). proceedings.mlr.press/v67/gutierrez17a.htmlCited in Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  30. Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60–72. doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600207Cited in The model catalog, Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit
  31. Hand, D. J. (2009). Measuring classifier performance: A coherent alternative to the area under the ROC curve. Machine Learning, 77(1), 103–123. doi.org/10.1007/s10994-009-5119-5Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  32. Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36. doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747Cited in Evaluation and release, Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  33. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7Cited in Evaluation and release, Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  34. Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578–581. doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349Cited in Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit
  35. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960. doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354Cited in Held-back groups, Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  36. Johnson, G. A., Lewis, R. A., & Nubbemeyer, E. I. (2017). Ghost ads: Improving the economics of measuring online ad effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(6), 867–884. doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0297Cited in Measuring what a campaign caused
  37. Kaufman, S., Rosset, S., Perlich, C., & Stitelman, O. (2012). Leakage in data mining: Formulation, detection, and avoidance. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 6(4), Article 15. doi.org/10.1145/2382577.2382579Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  38. Kohavi, R., Longbotham, R., Sommerfield, D., & Henne, R. M. (2009). Controlled experiments on the web: Survey and practical guide. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 18(1), 140–181. doi.org/10.1007/s10618-008-0114-1Cited in Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  39. Kohavi, R., Tang, D., & Xu, Y. (2020). Trustworthy online controlled experiments: A practical guide to A/B testing. Cambridge University Press. doi.org/10.1017/9781108653985Cited in Measuring what a campaign caused
  40. Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5802–5805. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110Cited in Behavior before the act, Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit
  41. Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. (2013). When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(5), 561–576. doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0503Cited in Claims register, Habits and buying windows
  42. Lewis, R. A., & Rao, J. M. (2015). The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1941–1973. doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv023Cited in Held-back groups, Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  43. Ling, C. X., & Li, C. (1998). Data mining for direct marketing: Problems and solutions. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-98). AAAI Press. www.csd.uwo.ca/~xling/papers/kdd98.pdfCited in Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  44. Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  45. Martens, D., Provost, F., Clark, J., & Junqué de Fortuny, E. (2016). Mining massive fine-grained behavior data to improve predictive analytics. MIS Quarterly, 40(4), 869–888. doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.4.04Cited in Behavior before the act, Claims register
  46. Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. J. (2017). Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12714–12719. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710966114Cited in Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit
  47. Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’19) (pp. 220–229). ACM. doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287596Cited in How models work, Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  48. Moe, W. W. (2003). Buying, searching, or browsing: Differentiating between online shoppers using in-store navigational clickstream. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1–2).Cited in Signals and intent topics, Behavior before the act, Claims register
  49. Moreno-Torres, J. G., Raeder, T., Alaiz-Rodríguez, R., Chawla, N. V., & Herrera, F. (2012). A unifying view on dataset shift in classification. Pattern Recognition, 45(1), 521–530. doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2011.06.019Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  50. Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2008). Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (pp. 111–125). IEEE. doi.org/10.1109/SP.2008.33Cited in Claims register, Identity and hashing
  51. Neslin, S. A., Gupta, S., Kamakura, W., Lu, J., & Mason, C. H. (2006). Defection detection: Measuring and understanding the predictive accuracy of customer churn models. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 204–211. doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.2.204Cited in Evaluation and release, Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  52. Newcombe, H. B., Kennedy, J. M., Axford, S. J., & James, A. P. (1959). Automatic linkage of vital records. Science, 130(3381), 954–959. doi.org/10.1126/science.130.3381.954Cited in Identity and hashing
  53. Niculescu-Mizil, A., & Caruana, R. (2005). Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 625–632). ACM. doi.org/10.1145/1102351.1102430Cited in Reading a score, Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  54. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2015). Secure Hash Standard (SHS) (FIPS PUB 180-4). U.S. Department of Commerce. doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.180-4Cited in Identity and hashing, What leaves the platform
  55. Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114Cited in How a result is counted, Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  56. Ohm, P. (2010). Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review, 57, 1701–1777. papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1450006Cited in Identity and hashing
  57. Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54Cited in Signals and intent topics, The model catalog, Claims register, Habits and buying windows
  58. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Academic Press. doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2Cited in Traits, reasons and message fit
  59. Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), 11–31. doi.org/10.1080/00218499.1988.12467766Cited in Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit
  60. Roberts, D. R., Bahn, V., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M. S., Elith, J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Hauenstein, S., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., Schröder, B., Thuiller, W., Warton, D. I., Wintle, B. A., Hartig, F., & Dormann, C. F. (2017). Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography, 40(8), 913–929. doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02881Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  61. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. doi.org/10.1037/h0037350Cited in Held-back groups, Claims register, Measuring what a campaign caused
  62. Sahni, N. S., Narayanan, S., & Kalyanam, K. (2019). An experimental investigation of the effects of retargeted advertising: The role of frequency and timing. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(3), 401–418. doi.org/10.1177/0022243718813987Cited in Signals and intent topics, Claims register, Habits and buying windows
  63. Saito, T., & Rehmsmeier, M. (2015). The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0118432. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118432Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  64. Schmittlein, D. C., Morrison, D. G., & Colombo, R. (1987). Counting your customers: Who are they and what will they do next?. Management Science, 33(1), 1–24. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.1.1Cited in Habits and buying windows
  65. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J.-F., & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 (pp. 2503–2511).Cited in Evaluating ranking models
  66. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention–behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003Cited in Behavior before the act, Claims register
  67. Shmueli, G. (2010). To explain or to predict?. Statistical Science, 25(3), 289–310. doi.org/10.1214/10-STS330Cited in Evaluation and release, Claims register, Evaluating ranking models
  68. Smith, W. R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 3–8. doi.org/10.1177/002224295602100102Cited in Splitting an audience, Claims register
  69. Speicher, T., Ali, M., Venkatadri, G., Ribeiro, F. N., Arvanitakis, G., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K. P., Loiseau, P., & Mislove, A. (2018). Potential for discrimination in online targeted advertising. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 81 (pp. 5–19). proceedings.mlr.press/v81/speicher18a.htmlCited in Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit
  70. Sweeney, L. (2000). Simple demographics often identify people uniquely (Data Privacy Working Paper 3). Carnegie Mellon University. dataprivacylab.org/projects/identifiability/paper1.pdfCited in Reporting principles, Claims register, Identity and hashing
  71. Sweeney, L. (2002). k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(5), 557–570. dataprivacylab.org/projects/kanonymity/index.htmlCited in Claims register, Identity and hashing
  72. Teeny, J. D., Siev, J. J., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2021). A review and conceptual framework for understanding personalized matching effects in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 382–414. doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1198Cited in Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit, Creative plan
  73. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105–110.Cited in Splitting an audience, Claims register
  74. Verhoef, P. C., Neslin, S. A., & Vroomen, B. (2007). Multichannel customer management: Understanding the research-shopper phenomenon. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2), 129–148. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.11.002Cited in Behavior before the act
  75. Verplanken, B., & Roy, D. (2016). Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 127–134. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.008Cited in The model catalog, Claims register, Habits and buying windows
  76. Wainer, H. (2007). The most dangerous equation. American Scientist, 95, 249–256.Cited in Reporting principles, Splitting an audience, Claims register, Audience groups
  77. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249Cited in Reading a score, Behavior before the act, Claims register
  78. Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4651-1Cited in Splitting an audience, Claims register, Audience groups
  79. Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1281–1297. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1281Cited in The model catalog, Claims register, Habits and buying windows
  80. Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2009). The habitual consumer. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), 579–592. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.08.003Cited in Habits and buying windows
  81. Wood, W., & Rünger, D. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289–314. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417Cited in Habits and buying windows
  82. Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(4), 1036–1040. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418680112Cited in The model catalog, Claims register, Traits, reasons and message fit
  83. Zimmeck, S., Wang, O., Alicki, K., Wang, J., & Eng, S. (2023). Usability and enforceability of Global Privacy Control. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2023(2), 265–281. doi.org/10.56553/popets-2023-0052Cited in Identity and hashing
  84. Zimmeck, S., Snyder, P., Brookman, J., & Zucker-Scharff, A. (Eds.). (2026, September 24). Global Privacy Control (GPC). W3C Working Draft. www.w3.org/TR/gpc/Cited in Identity and hashing, Privacy and permitted use

Every figure on these pages carries the date it was measured. See Published figures.

© 2026 Moonbrush Inc. Moonbrush, atlas, stage and Gravity are pending trademarks of Moonbrush Inc.

PrivacyTermsSecurityTrustContact